Compensatory fine
Source:
Section 137.101 — Compensatory fine, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors137.html
.
Notes of Decisions
Amount of compensatory fine may not exceed maximum fine that could otherwise be imposed for underlying offense. State v. Gray, 113 Or App 552, 833 P2d 341 (1992)
Pecuniary damage must be shown before compensatory fine may be imposed. State v. Smith, 116 Or App 558, 842 P2d 805 (1992), on reconsideration 120 Or App 438, 852 P2d 934 (1993)
Pecuniary loss suffered by injured person compensable only if special damages could be recovered in civil action. State v. Barkley, 315 Or 420, 846 P2d 390 (1993); State v. Smith, 120 Or App 438, 852 P2d 934 (1993)
Consideration of defendant’s ability to pay is prerequisite to imposition of compensatory fine. State v. Packer, 140 Or App 488, 916 P2d 322 (1996)
Prerequisites of compensatory fine are (1) criminal activity, (2) economic damages and (3) casual relationship between two. State v. Haines, 238 Or App 431, 242 P3d 705 (2010)
Provision authorizes court to order state to share portion of fine imposed under underlying statute with victim but does not itself authorize imposition of fine. State v. Moore, 239 Or App 30, 243 P3d 151 (2010)
It is plain error for trial court to impose compensatory fine in addition to punitive fine for same count. State v. Moreno-Hernandez, 290 Or App 468, 415 P3d 1088 (2018), aff’d 365 Or 175, 442 P3d 1100 (2019)
Imposition of compensatory fine requires showing that recipient is subject to economic obligation. State v. Moreno-Hernandez, 290 Or App 468, 415 P3d 1088 (2018), aff’d 365 Or 175, 442 P3d 1100 (2019)
Nothing in this section ties amount of compensatory fine to amount of economic damages that victim suffered. State v. Rockett, 302 Or App 655, 463 P3d 1 (2020), rev’d in part on other grounds 368 Or 510, 492 P3d 66 (2021), Sup Ct review allowed