Maintenance
- disclosure
- exceptions to confidentiality
Source:
Section 419A.255 — Maintenance; disclosure; exceptions to confidentiality, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors419A.html
.
Notes of Decisions
Under former similar statute
In view of the confidential nature of the juvenile casework file, the trial court should have gone through the file and made available pertinent parts of it for defense (opposing) counsel to use in cross-examination. State ex rel Juvenile Dept. v. La Mar, 7 Or App 132, 490 P2d 191 (1971)
A juvenile witness may not be impeached by evidence that he admitted acts which would be a crime if committed by an adult. State v. Burr, 18 Or App 494, 525 P2d 1067 (1974)
Files relating to parent’s treatment of other children are not absolutely inadmissible in proceeding terminating parental rights. State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Kramer, 34 Or App 1013, 580 P2d 211 (1978)
Defendant charged with arson was denied right of confrontation where trial court prevented defense from questioning alleged accomplices about burglaries which they had admitted in prior juvenile proceedings, because defendant’s need to cross-examine principal witnesses to show possible bias outweighed state’s need to maintain confidentiality of juvenile records. Burr v. Sullivan, 618 F2d 583 (1980)
In general
Juvenile court may order agency to provide adoptive home studies to attorney of dependent child prior to agency issuance of placement report. State ex rel State Office for Services to Children and Families v. Williams, 168 Or App 538, 7 P3d 655 (2000)
Where suitable adoptive placement is sought for child, court has discretion to order disclosure to court appointed special advocate of home study information submitted to adoption committee for consideration. State ex rel State Office for Services to Children and Families v. Mitchell, 182 Or App 402, 49 P3d 838 (2002), Sup Ct review denied
Where child is no longer candidate for adoption, court may not order disclosure of adoption home studies to child’s attorney or court appointed special advocate. State ex rel State Office for Services to Children and Families v. Morgan, 183 Or App 140, 51 P3d 637 (2002)
Where defendant is circuit court judge who denies plaintiff’s public records request under this section, Article VII (Original), section 9, of Oregon Constitution, prohibits another circuit court judge from reviewing denial of public records request. Oregonian Publishing Co., LLC v. Waller, 253 Or App 123, 293 P3d 1046 (2012), Sup Ct review denied
“History and prognosis” materials located in either supplemental confidential file or record of case, and duplicates located elsewhere, are privileged. Dept. of Human Services v. E.J., 316 Or App 537, 504 P3d 1262 (2021), Sup Ct review allowed
Attorney General Opinions
Under former similar statute
Access to police reports and records on juveniles by Oregon Law Enforcement Council, (1974) Vol 36, p 782; constitutionality of provisions that juvenile court proceedings and records may be closed to public, (1977) Vol 38, p 1504; release by police officer of juvenile’s name at time of arrest, (1981) Vol 42, p 17