Trade Regulation

ORS 646A.525
Definitions for ORS 646A.525 to 646A.535


As used in ORS 646A.525 (Definitions for ORS 646A.525 to 646A.535) to 646A.535 (Assistance of Attorney General in obtaining recall notices):

(1)

(a) “Children’s product” means a consumer product that is designed or intended:

(A)

For the care of or use by a child under 12 years of age; or

(B)

To come into contact with a child under 12 years of age at the time the product is used.

(b)

“Children’s product” does not include:

(A)

A medication, drug, food or other product that is intended to be ingested; or

(B)

A crib, as defined in ORS 646A.504 (Definitions for ORS 646A.500 to 646A.514).

(2)

“Retailer” means a person that, in the ordinary course of the person’s business, sells or offers for sale, leases, sublets or otherwise distributes a children’s product to consumers in this state.

(3)

(a) “Warning” means a communication about a health or safety hazard that a children’s product poses to consumers that is:

(A)

Directed to a retailer; and

(B)

Intended to inform the retailer about the health or safety hazard, instruct the retailer to remove the children’s product from inventory or provide the retailer with a method to eliminate the health or safety hazard.

(b)

“Warning” does not include a communication:

(A)

Directed to consumers; and

(B)

Affixed to the children’s product or packaging related to the children’s product or provided by the retailer to the consumer as part of a transaction related to the children’s product. [2008 c.31 §1]
§§ 646A.600 to 646A.628

Law Review Citations

52 WLR 451 (2016)

§§ 646A.400 to 646A.418

(formerly 646.315 to 646.375)

Notes of Decisions

Where purchaser fails to provide notice of condition requiring repair, presumption does not arise that repair time exceeding 30 business days demonstrates inability of manufacturer to conform vehicle. Pavel v. Winnebago Industries, Inc., 127 Or App 16, 870 P2d 856 (1994)

Repair time exceeding 30 business days as evidence of inability to conform vehicle applies only to presently existing defect. Pavel v. Winnebago Industries, Inc., 127 Or App 16, 870 P2d 856 (1994)

Law Review Citations

19 WLR 329 (1983)


Source

Last accessed
Jun. 26, 2021