Rules of the Road for Drivers
Reckless driving
- penalty
Notes of Decisions
Under former similar statute
Evidence that defendant was driving while intoxicated, although he was not so charged, together with evidence of several near-misses with parked cars and oncoming traffic was sufficient to allow trial court to conclude defendant’s driving was reckless. State v. Griffin, 55 Or App 849, 640 P2d 629 (1982), Sup Ct review denied
In general
Statutory protections against former jeopardy are not violated where in single proceeding defendant is acquitted by jury of crime and then convicted by court of lesser included offense that jury cannot try. State v. Cuffee, 87 Or App 293, 742 P2d 637 (1987); State v. Darlin, 122 Or App 172, 857 P2d 859 (1993)
Careless driving is lesser included offense of reckless driving. State v. Cuffee, 87 Or App 293, 742 P2d 637 (1987)
Court erred by instructing jury that term “recklessly” includes driving while under influence of intoxicants where effect of instruction was to direct jury to find defendant guilty of reckless driving upon finding defendant guilty of DUII. State v. Luke, 104 Or App 541, 802 P2d 672 (1990)
Finding that driving “endangered” safety of others or property does not require direct evidence of manner in which defendant actually drove vehicle. State v. Smith, 218 Or App 568, 180 P3d 148 (2008)