Notice to putative father when parentage not established
Source:
Section 109.096 — Notice to putative father when parentage not established, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors109.html
.
Notes of Decisions
If a putative father has not come forward to initiate parent-child relationship, his liberty interest is insufficient to justify procedures necessary to apprise him of adoption proceeding under this section, and motion to dispense with notice of adoption did not violate federal due process rights of putative father. P and P v. CSD, 66 Or App 66, 673 P2d 864 (1983)
Putative father who filed filiation proceeding in another state but did not file notice with Oregon Vital Statistics Unit was not entitled to notice of adoption proceeding. Burns v. Crenshaw, 84 Or App 257, 733 P2d 922 (1987), Sup Ct review denied
Putative father otherwise qualifying for notice is not barred from objecting due to failure to qualify under notice to Vital Statistics Unit provision. Vanlue v. Collins, 98 Or App 140, 779 P2d 163 (1989), Sup Ct review denied, as modified by 99 Or App 469, 782 P2d 951 (1989); Hiskey v. Hamilton, 111 Or App 39, 824 P2d 1170 (1992), Sup Ct review denied
To set aside adoption based on mother’s fraud in adoption proceeding, father must obtain final judgment from trial court regarding mother’s fraud within one year after adoption has become final. Hallford v. Smith, 120 Or App 57, 852 P2d 249 (1993), Sup Ct review denied
Provision for putative father to establish fraud by petitioner “within one year after” entry of final decree or order sets time limit for establishing fraud, but does not require that adoption be finalized before fraud is established. Gruett v. Nesbitt, 172 Or App 113, 17 P3d 1090 (2001), on reconsideration173 Or App 225, 21 P3d 168 (2001)