Jury number
- examination
Mentioned in
Overturning Apodaca v. Oregon Should Be Easy: Nonunanimous Jury Verdicts in Criminal Cases Undermine the Credibility of Our Justice System
“In 1934,…Oregon became the second state, after Louisiana, to allow nonunanimous juries in criminal cases.”
Bibliographic info
Source:
Section 136.210 — Jury number; examination, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors136.html
.
Notes of Decisions
Failure to show on record criminal defendant’s consent to proceed with less than 12 jurors was error, and appellate court could not remand for determination of whether defendant consented “off the record.” State v. Lutz, 306 Or 499, 760 P2d 249 (1988)
Defendant’s affirmative consent on record is required before trial can proceed with fewer than 12 persons on jury. State v. Fierro, 107 Or App 569, 813 P2d 57 (1991)
Law Review Citations
53 OLR 106 (1973)